Motorola’s comeback tour within the U.S. could be rapidly coming to an abrupt halt. The model, nonetheless a minor participant within the general marketplace for the finest Android telephones, discovered latest success with the Motorola Razr line of price range and flagship foldables. Nevertheless, a patent dispute between Sony Ericsson and Motorola Mobility (owned by Lenovo) might eradicate the supply of Motorola handsets within the U.S., in line with Reuters.
In an preliminary ruling Tuesday, Dec. 17, a decide for the U.S. Worldwide Commerce Fee determined that Motorola’s telephones infringe on key 5G patents held by Sony Ericsson. The smartphones in query embrace these within the Moto G, Edge, and Razr lineups. If the preliminary ruling by the ITC stands, imports of Motorola telephones within the U.S. might be banned, all however eliminating their availability.
The ITC will difficulty a ultimate ruling in April 2025, and if its preliminary choice is upheld, a ban on Motorola telephones within the U.S. is prone to occur. That may have ripple results all through the U.S. market, as a result of Lenovo made up 14% of the nation’s cellular market share as of Q3 2024, in line with Counterpoint Analysis. Crucially, among the model’s most profitable smartphones are concerned within the dispute.
Motorola’s absence would depart a gap out there, notably the place clamshell foldables are involved. There merely is not one other participant making inexpensive foldables within the U.S. like Motorola did with the Razr 2023 and Razr 2024. It is attainable that as a substitute of elevating a rising model like OnePlus, a ban on Motorola telephones would simply make the massive three of Apple, Samsung, and Google much more dominant.
In November 2024, one trade report indicated that a significant competitor within the foldable market was contemplating an exit. Getting into 2025, we might be down a minimum of one foldable producer if that report seems to be correct. Motorola might signify one other, and it is attainable that nobody steps as much as exchange it. We might be again the place we began, with Samsung as the one main clamshell foldable producer and no must innovate as a result of an absence of competitors.
It looks like patent disputes within the cellular sector have gotten more and more frequent. OPPO and Vivo just lately ended a dispute with Nokia about 5G patents, and OnePlus is now in sizzling water once more in Germany over an analogous difficulty. Whereas it is nice that manufacturers are being held accountable for his or her use of patents, it is a disgrace that these selections solely lower the variety of telephones which can be out there for customers.
Motorola telephones might be banned: How we bought right here
If that sounds acquainted, it ought to. Lately, a number of Chinese language manufacturers have grow to be concerned in patent disputes surrounding their makes use of of 5G know-how in smartphones. Notably, Motorola itself is preventing the identical battle with Sony Ericsson in a number of markets. Preliminary court docket selections in Brazil and Columbia already dominated in favor of Sony Ericsson, and extra authorized battles are going down in South America and the UK, per Reuters.
How did we get right here? The tide began to show in Sony Ericsson’s favor earlier this month when an ITC decide rejected Motorola’s finest protection towards the patent infringement claims. Motorola mentioned {that a} 2011 license settlement between it and Sony Ericsson coated use of Ericsson know-how in Moto G, Edge, and Razr telephones. In different phrases, the corporate is not denying it used the know-how — it is arguing that it was allowed to.
The issue with Motorola’s declare is that the 2011 settlement was penned ages in the past, earlier than the corporate was offered to Google after which offered once more to Lenovo. Extra importantly, a clause within the licensing settlement defined that Motorola would be capable of use the licensed know-how in “commercially affordable updates or extensions of such Licensed merchandise.” The ITC decide dominated in favor of Ericsson, tossing apart Motorola’s argument on the premise that not one of the three cellphone lineups in query even existed on the time the 2011 settlement was reached (by way of IP Fray).
Motorola might discover different authorized avenues to dam the transfer — attorneys for Lenovo beforehand argued that the licensing settlement was coated by U.Okay. regulation, and recommended that the ITC ought to look forward to U.Okay. courts to rule earlier than issuing its personal ruling. In fact, in mild of the ITC’s preliminary choice, that did not occur. And if the ITC’s ruling is upheld, Motorola telephones might be off the cabinets for the foreseeable future.